Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 2010-2015

Woohoo! The last few years of winners! The test of time has not really applied to these yet, so nothing here has been deemed essential. Neither, however, has anything been considered a poor choice. This decade is hard to fully evaluate and perhaps whatever wins this next Sunday will determine how it will shape. At least, there were no bad films.

2010-2015

The Good

The Artist

Now that I’ve seen more silent classics this is less impressive. Homage films at their very nature feel like inside jokes to the audience and that can be detrimental. Though enjoyable, fun, and I’m glad this exists- I’m not sure there is much original in The Artist. Originality isn't always necessary, but this is very similar to Singin’ in the Rain and that kind of hurts it. It’s a good movie, but I’m unsure it if was really the best film that year. My vote would have gone to the also nominated The Descendants. I’m glad this sparks an interest in silent films at least. Grade: B

Argo

Like Titanic before it, Argo’s best achievement is making the story suspenseful when we already know how it's gonna end. Ben Affleck shows off his directing skills with this pretty impressive thriller about sneaking hostages out of Iran, using film production as a ruse. Though I was a much bigger fan fellow nominee Beasts of the Southern Wild, it makes sense why this won the top prize. Grade: B+

Birdman: Or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

Somehow I did not get really enchanted by this film. I enjoyed the subtext and intertext, and the text itself is fine and all, but I remain underwhelmed. The “one take” gimmick is interesting and showcases great technical work, too bad the story seems pretentious and never quite achieves the depth it desires. I once said something along the lines of "Birdman is a great film for literature and theater majors to be ultimately disappointed in.” I stick by that. Tim and I talked about this at length in one of our videos if you really want to go deeper. Grade: B

The Great

The King’s Speech

Though a WWII film, more or less, I super dig this film. Maybe because it’s about public speaking, or maybe because Firth and Rush are so much fun to watch. Either way, I think this is a great film showing a different perspective of a troubling time. This winning over The Social Network irked some, leading to questions about the relevance of the Academy. I understand, but does a film about Facebook feel all that relevant now? The King’s Speech definitely has more of those tired “Academy Award” traits too, but I would still take this over David Fincher’s film. Grade: A-

12 Years a Slave

This era’s Schindler's List. Not an easy watch, but the performances are the reason to seek this out if not for the story. Now don't get me wrong, the story is very compelling. A haunting, arresting, and disturbing slave narrative that, like Spielberg’s epic, won’t leave you for awhile afterward. Grade: A-

Spotlight

There aren’t enough great newspaper dramas out there to begin with, even less now that newspapers are constantly disappearing. This account of the investigation of pedophilia in the Catholic church charmed me the moment I started it. Great performances from all around and tight direction. I did however feel there was a lack of tension at times, you kept waiting for some huge opposition to happened and it doesn’t really. Still, a great film. Grade: A-

Okay, considering we only have the two categories this time, I'll rank these. This wasn't easy, but here you go:

6. The Artist   5. Argo 4. Birdman 3. Spotlight   2. 12 Years a Slave  1. The King’s Speech

Parting Thoughts

I enjoyed watching all these flicks, even if it was a bit of a chore sometimes. I suppose if I want to tell you which were the ones that stuck out the most, the ones I thoroughly enjoyed, I’d say Amadeus, Rocky, Kramer vs. Kramer, The Sting, All the King’s Men, and Mrs. Miniver. I'm not saying these are “the best of the best.” That has been determined by some many folks before me. These are ones I look forward to revisiting from time to time.

Thanks for reading!

Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 2000-2009

Hey, we made it to the current century!  Movies you may have actually seen in the cinema! Like the 90s this decade is hard to be solidly objective about, but it is easy to see which were truly the best. The Academy made some odd decisions this decade, but there are some great and seminal films.

2000-2009

“Really? This was ‘the Best?’”

A Beautiful Mind (2001)

This movie isn’t bad. It’s kind of fun and everyone does their job well. Russell Crowe is good, but the supporting characters (real and imagined) are who really shine. A pretty good Ron Howard film, though I like his 80s comedies more. However, the thing is A Beautiful Mind is nowhere near as good as Mulholland Drive, which wasn’t even nominated for Best Picture. My favorite moment at that year's Oscars was this quick shot of David Lynch and Robert Altman chatting after losing to Ron Howard for best director. Grade: B-

Crash (2005)

Imagine if Robert Altman made an after school special about racism, but then take away any nuance and subtlety Bob might have had. You’d basically have Crash. The ensemble of actors all do a fine job and technically the film is more than adequately done. The script on the other hand, seems naive, idealistic, and sensational. To be fair, 2005 was a really good year. Other nominees, Munich, Capote, Good Night and Good Luck, were amazing works of cinema. But what’s really insulting was that Crash won out over fourth nominee Brokeback Mountain. Sometimes, the Academy makes really bad choices. I'm still pretty irked with them about that, if you couldn't tell. Grade: C+

The Good

Chicago (2002)

I was already a fan of this musical before it was a film, being a Fosse aficionado. None of that famous choreography style is in this version, but the dancing and singing is still top notch. I’m not sure how I feel about all the musical numbers being “in the mind,” but the film works well with its choices. Richard Gere, John C. Reilly, and Queen Latifah really stand out in an already exceptional ensemble. Grade: B

Million Dollar Baby (2004)

A sports film, mostly. The female boxer story is really cool and exciting to watch. The last act of the film doesn’t put me off like it does others, but it starts to feel like a different film at that point. Swank and Eastwood do some of their best work, I just wish that last act worked better. Grade: B-

The Great

Gladiator (2000)

A sprawling tale of a Roman general thrown into the arena by a jealous usurping emperor, Ridley Scott crafts one of his best films. Though Russell Crowe is good, it’s Joaquin Phoenix you really remember as the evil emperor. I feel like I’ve seen a number of films this borrows from, but Scott and company make it seem fresh and new. When it comes to Roman Empire epics, here are my top three: 1. Ben-Hur 2. Spartacus 3. Gladiator. This makes it to the top three for a reason. Grade: B+

The Departed (2006)

A remake of Infernal Affairs, Martin Scorsese adds his touch to a story of undercover cops and criminals. This is probably the best Boston film ever, and a great crime epic in addition. Dicaprio and Damon hold their own against a superbly bizarre Jack Nicholson. You can see flashes of McMurphy and the Joker in Jack’s Frank Costello. Many twists and turns and hidden x’s make this a great, if a little long, film. Grade: A-

Slumdog Millionaire (2008)

When I first saw Slumdog, I felt like it was a sort of Bollywood take on City of God. That probably isn’t very fair. Though there are some stylistic and character similarities, they are pretty different flicks. Now that I’ve reevaluated it, I find its structure to be its best component. Although, the choice of using Who Wants to Be a Millionaire seemed tired then and kind of dated now- it does establish the best path for the film to follow. A great story, with wonderful performances, but I’m not a fan of the Bollywood coda. I felt like it kind of cheapened the resolution, but I could be wrong there. Grade: B+

The Hurt Locker (2009)

The first film to produce a female Best Director award (against her ex-husband, by the way), Katheryn Bigelow’s war drama shows the tension, the horror, and the boredom of war. I love that every time you see an actor your recognize as a hero from other films, they die. Spoiler Alert? Grade: B+

The Essential

No Country for Old Men (2007)

I might have a bit of bias on this because I lived in Albuquerque when they filmed this Cormac McCarthy adaptation. At some point I might go through the Coen brothers’ filmography like I have with the Best Pictures. Ethan and Joel basically have three kinds of movies- Blood Simples, Raising Arizonas, and Barton Finks. This of the more Blood Simple variety. A great crime western that I think solidified their legacy of auteurs. Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh is up there with Nurse Ratched, Hannibal Lecter, and Frank Booth as one of the scariest screen villains. I don’t think this is the brothers’ best film, that might be Fargo or Barton Fink, but this is certainly essential for both the Coens and Best Pictures. Grade: A-
 

The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King (2003)

I’m not in love with these movies like a lot of others. I guess, I’m more of a Harry Potter guy. I totally agree with Kevin Smith's summation that all of these movies are 9 hours of walking. Exciting walking at least. I suppose it should be noted that, with the exception of the last two films, Harry Potter can be boiled down to “Harry has a difficult year at school.” Anyway, I agree with the criticisms that Return of the King has multiple endings and I wish that was better dealt with, especially because Peter Jackson is capable and knew what he was doing. If I voted in 2003 I probably would have voted for Mystic River (or maybe Lost in Translation), but culturally the Lord of the Rings films are more important. Not just important fantasy, but also important to how films could be made. Grade: B+

Come back Tuesday for the last batch!

Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 1990-1999

As we get closer to the present, it’s harder and harder to have perspective on these films. Something that captivated us all one year could basically die in about a decade or two. Driving Miss Daisy is an example. So figuring out what is essential is more difficult than in other decades, but what is good and such is not. Even lacking the added hindsight, the 90s were a strange decade.

1990-1999

“Really? This was ‘the Best?’”

Dances with Wolves (1990)

Okay, so this isn’t as bad as I was concerned. It is basically everything good and terrible about Kevin Costner minus baseball. I don’t think this film deserves it’s three hours, and it’s borderline offensive that an hour has been added to it over the years. The concept of the film hasn’t aged well. The film is basically well made, and Costner doesn’t suck as the protagonist. That’s kind of the thing though, he is much better in other roles not directed by him. I wouldn’t call it a bad film, just bloated and pretentious. Though it’s epicness and scope might be larger than fellow nominees Goodfellas and Awakenings, it does not surpass those films in quality. Grade: C+

The Good

Braveheart (1995)

When I first saw this when I was 12, I thought it was one of the most awesome films I’d ever seen. Violent, inspiring, and well put together, it makes sense that it struck a chord with adolescent me. Adult me is less impressed now, partly because I’ve seen better war films. Also the “inspiring” moments feel cheesy now. It’s strange that a film so bloody could be the cinematic equivalent of nachos. I’m making more fun of it than I mean.  It’s actually a pretty good film, if a smidge superficial. Grade: B-

The English Patient (1996)

So to me, this is the apex of the "Academy Award" genre. A doomed romance set during a war. It’s the most David Lean film not directed by David Lean. I wasn’t looking forward to this, but I gotta admit, it is pretty good. Thumbless Willem Dafoe might be my favorite aspect of the film. The doomed romance is tiresome, but the rest is enthralling and entertaining. Grade: B

The Great

Unforgiven (1992)

It took me awhile to get into westerns. I’m not sure why. It might be the machismo or the fact I find John Wayne ridiculous. I didn’t really start to appreciate westerns until late in college when I saw Destry Rides Again. Unforgiven helped solidify my enjoyment of the genre. The gunslinger reckoning with an evil sheriff storyline is old, but Eastwood injects new life into it with his direction and acting. Grade: B+

Forrest Gump (1994)

Yes it is schmaltzy and “feel good,” but that doesn’t keep it from being great. Though this could have become Driving Miss Daisy, Tom Hanks’s portrayal and Robert Zemeckis's direction keeps it from going that way. There are bipolar contingencies about this film: those who find it saccharine nostalgia and those who enjoy it as a piece of cinema magic. I guess I’m in the latter camp. I think this film's flaws are magnified over time for being the film that beat Pulp Fiction. All the 1994 Best Picture nominees were excellent so I kind of get the feeling that no matter which won, people would be hypercritical. Kind of like Rocky in 1976. Grade: B+

Shakespeare in Love (1998)

I’ve said it before that I am a fan of the old Bard. So it doesn’t bother me, like it does some, that this beat Saving Private Ryan. This has a bit more of that “Academy Award” stuff- troubled romance, period drama, etc. It is however downright delightful and fun. Centered on the first performance of Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare falls in love with a woman pretending to be a man. If you enjoyed your Shakespeare classes, you’ll love it. If you didn’t, you might still like it actually. I do remember pulling for this to win back in 1998, but now I think I prefer the also nominated Life is Beautiful over this and Saving Private Ryan. Grade: B+

American Beauty (1999)

I’m don’t know if I can adequately and objectively review this film like I can the others. When I first saw this as a freshman in high school it really spoke to me, so it has become one of those movies that I may be a bit blinded to its faults.  A middle aged man having an existential awakening over an infatuation for his teenage daughter’s friend seems like a bad film. Alan Ball’s screenplay, however, is so well constructed and hilarious that you find yourself really getting into it. I’m a big fan of suburban malaise films, and I think this film is what started that love. Grade: A-

The Essential

Silence of the Lambs (1991)

Most of the time, I think of this as a horror film. There are days where I consider the “thriller” argument and then I remember the whole wearing a dress made of skin thing. Winner of picture, directing, actor, and actress and deservedly so. Sadly, I think the parodies and the sequels have diminished how good this film is for a lot of the audience. The story and the suspense are so captivating that the film will end and you’ll want to watch it again, despite how gritty and gory. Hannibal Lecter captured the imagination of audiences for decades to come. Grade: A

Schindler’s List (1993)

Spielberg’s epic and THE holocaust film. Just about everything about this film works: The direction, the performances, the selective use of color. A haunting film, you kind of need to be mentally prepared for it. It will stick with you after watching too. Grade: A

Come back Thursday for the 2000s!

Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 1980-1989

Oh, the 80s. Heyday of new wave, Reagan, and embarrassingly large hair. Despite there being some truly great audience favorites during this decade (Ghostbusters, Back to the Future, Indiana Jones etc.), stuff at the Academy wasn’t as great. Let’s take a look.

1980-1989

“Really? This was ‘the Best?’”

Out of Africa (1985)

I know I’ve talked about how awesome Meryl is in the 70s post, but really she is the only reason to watch this. She gives one of her best performances in an overlong, well-shot, but very dull film about a love affair on an African farm. Redford is good too, but he doesn’t make the film anymore interesting. I’ve joked about there being an “Academy Award” genre, and I think this held the top title of said genre for a bit. Grade: C+

Driving Miss Daisy (1989)

This movie isn’t awful, which a lot of folks may lead you to believe. It is extremely schmaltzy and frankly too nice. When you consider that was against other nominees like Dead Poet’s Society and Born on the Fourth of July it seems a weird choice. Even stranger when you consider that this was nominated and Do the Right Thing and Glory weren’t. It’s mostly just okay, a movie you’d watch with your grandmother on a Sunday afternoon. Grade: B-

The Good

Ordinary People (1980)

Folks tend to dislike this flick due to the fact it beat Raging Bull. True, Marty’s pugilist drama is superior in a lot of ways and is probably the better film, but Redford’s family drama doesn’t deserve all the hate. Mary Tyler Moore plays amazingly against type, and that alone I think is worth watching. It has an ending that bothers people, but I think its what makes the film work. Grade: B

Terms of Endearment (1983)

Another family drama, though also pretty funny. Weirdly, I think the best way to describe this is “a Texas Mother/Daughter story about searching for love.” That doesn’t quite do it justice, but you get the idea. Jack Nicholson plays a retired astronaut. Not something you see everyday there either. I liked it a lot actually, though I felt it could be tightened up editing wise. Furthermore, I don’t know if it is  a better film than the also nominated The Big Chill. Grade: B

Rain Man (1988)

Another Sunday afternoon with your grandma kind of flick. This is one of those films that penetrated the culture so much it got parodied to death. Tom Cruise discovers he has a long lost autistic brother in Dustin Hoffman and they travel across the country. It is fun and hits all the right notes, but I can’t help but feel it isn’t quite great. Grade: B

The Great

Platoon (1986)

Maybe not the greatest Vietnam movie, but certainly up there. Oliver Stone’s tale does not let us forget that war is Hell. Said Hell is not just the regular horrors of war, but also the other soldiers in your unit. Willem Dafoe and Tom Berenger are so good that I think people forget Charlie Sheen is in the flick. Johnny Depp too. I’m still not much for war pics, so I probably will never need to see this again, but I’m glad I did. Grade: B+

The Last Emperor (1987)

Actually filmed in the Forbidden City, Bernardo Bertolucci tells the story of Puyi, China’s last emperor. It’s an interesting story both biographically and politically. The film's cinematography is examplary and the performances are outstanding. I really dug the score too. It might be a bit long, and a even longer version exists. Grade: A-

The Essential

Chariots of Fire (1981)

Cards on the table, I ran track in high school, so this might mean more to me than others. I imagine for some it’s just a stuffy flick about Brits running. Okay, it is that, but it's amazing how engaging and interesting it is considering all that. Inspiring and legendarily scored (you know the theme even if you don't realize). If this film doesn't make you wanna get up and do something- you might be dead. Grade: A-

Gandhi (1982)

The biopic to end all biopics. Ben Kingsley gives a performance I don’t think he has quite topped. This is one of the few 3 hour films that I don’t mind being 3 hours. Though I am a bigger fan of the also nominated Tootsie, this was clearly the better film. Grade: A

Amadeus (1984)

Perhaps not the most accurate period drama, Amadeus makes Mozart seem cool. Part of this is Tom Hulce’s superbly manic performance, the rest is the story itself. In one of the most bizarre and strange acts of revenge ever, F. Murray Abraham as rival Salieri attempts to drive Mozart insane. This might be the most entertaining film of the Academy Award genre. It's trailer is one of my favorites. Grade: A

See you on Tuesday for the 90s!

Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 1970-1979

The 70s. The "Me" decade of Watergate, disco, and the end of the Vietnam War. This was when the New Hollywood era really peaked and started to be taken more seriously. There were bad flicks, of course, but this decade doesn’t have a winner that I felt belonged in the “Really? This was ‘the Best?’” category. All of the winners really were exceptional films.

1970-1979

The Good

Patton (1970)

Though still fatigued by WWII films, I can see why people dig this flick. Penned by Francis Ford Coppola and masterfully performed by George C. Scott, the film has quality all over it. A biographical war film, we get to see the war from Patton's perspective, which is larger than life. It's a bit long, but it is well made. When it comes to war flicks from 1970, I’m more of a M*A*S*H* guy than Patton. Grade: B

The French Connection (1971)

Being a fan of gritty crime dramas, I was really looking forward to finally sitting down and watching this whole film. Though Hackman as Popeye Doyle is engaging and the overall style of the film is great- I just didn’t quite get into the story like I thought I would. It’s still good, but not as great as I thought it would be. Still, the film has possibly the best car chase in cinema history. Grade: B

The Deer Hunter (1978)

Like I said earlier, this feels like the Vietnam answer to The Best Years of Our Lives. It's gut wrenching and hardcore, but it could probably have a good 45 minutes of “pre-war” cut. De Niro and Walken might be the strongest of the ensemble, but Meryl Streep does what Meryl does- be awesome. Her part isn’t very big and that is a pity. Grade:  B-

The Great

The Sting (1973)

There aren’t a lot of “delightful” crime features, but this is probably the best one. Newman and Redford and joined together again by their Butch and Sundance director. I wonder how many people only know Scott Joplin music because of this movie. Though there is a lot of “old Hollywood” in this film and that might be why the Academy picked it over the possibly better nominees The Exorcist and American Graffiti. Still, it’s one of the few best picture winners that can easily be described as "fun." Grade B+

Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)

This won against All that Jazz, which is possibly the best movie musical ever. So I was kind of prepared to be unimpressed, but you know what- it’s a pretty great flick. Possibly Hoffman’s best performance. Though audiences were introduced to Ms. Streep the year before in The Deer Hunter, this is the beginning of the Meryl we all know and love. Something I really dig about this flick how well it can work without dialogue. Those sequences really show the craft of film making and acting. Grade: B+

The Essential

The Godfather (1972)

The Godfather Part II (1974)

These films, like Gone with the Wind and Casablanca, have had a lot written about them and you don’t need me to tell you that they are essential. Seriously, they are two of the greatest films ever made. I am one of those who thinks the second is better than the first, there are a number of us. Anyway, this is how you do a saga. I do come from an Italian family, so I guess this gets to me on that level and may not on others. If you think of yourself as a lover of film, or have just a passing interest- these are required viewing. Grades: A- (Part I), A (Part II)

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975)

This movie might run the gamut of emotions. It’s funny, horrifying, inspiring, depressing, etc. This is one of those rare moments where everything works out. Nicholson gives what is probably his best performance as McMurphy and Louise Fletcher as Nurse Ratched will haunt your nightmares.  Grade: A

Rocky (1976)

Not only did I watch all the Best Pictures last year, I also watched all the Rocky films. In 2015 Creed came out and I couldn’t remember if I had see all of the Italian Stallion’s entries, so I watched them in reverse order. I do not recommend this. The last five minutes of the previous entry is the first five of the next. Anyway, I’ve become a bit of a Rocky fan. So here’s the thing about 1976, everything up against Rocky was stellar: All the President's Men, Bound for Glory, Network, and Taxi Driver. I think any of them could’ve won and it would have made sense. What makes Rocky so essential? It would create the blueprint for sports and underdog films for the next 40 years, and it’s also a great movie. It might not be asking the hard questions like All the President's Men and Network, or have the haunting performances and direction of Taxi Driver, but its influence would change the language of film. Grade: A-

Annie Hall (1977)

This has gained some controversy over the years because it beat Star Wars, and that isn’t unexpected. Though a great film and an essential Woody Allen film, Annie Hall doesn’t have the cultural impact of the space opera. No one gets excited about a new Annie Hall action figure complete with lobsters. Well, maybe I would. What makes this essential is that it isn't just a rare comedy to win, but one of the best screenplays ever. It is, like most Allen films, super self absorbed, rambly, and some of the social norms haven’t aged well- it is a product of it’s time, but it is also hilarious and superbly structured. I don’t think this is Allen's best, that is probably Crimes and Misdemeanors. Even so, Annie Hall is a wonderful time. Grade: A-

On Thursday we'll grapple with the 1980s. See you then.

Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 1950-1959

Onward through the 1950s! The first real era when television was a force to be reckoned with. Because of the small screen, the big screen got bigger and more spectacular. Musicals really came into their own in this decade. Color and wide aspect ratios would soon take over. However, that doesn’t mean smaller black and white films stopped. In fact, I think they may have increased in quality during the 50s. Let’s take a look.

1950-1959

“Really? This was ‘the Best?’”

Greatest Show on Earth (1952)

    What should be a compelling and entertaining tale of the circus, is actually a bloated, somewhat boring mess. You can tell this was a “big deal” kind of flick: directed by Cecil B. Demille, a lot of top stars, over two hours, and lush color. For some reason, none of that really works.  There are two stories going on in this film- a narrative about people in the circus, and documentary like footage of circus acts. If there was less of the latter it would be a more worthy entry. Though, to be fair, the circus folk narrative isn’t particularly amazing either. No way is this a better film than the also nominated High Noon or The Quiet Man or the not nominated Singin’ in the Rain or The Bad and the Beautiful. I’m not really sure why this won out. Demille’s non-opus and Broadway Melody are, in my opinion, the bottom of the Best Picture barrel. Grade: D+

Around the World in 80 Days (1956)

    I liked this movie as a kid, but now that I’ve reevaluated it, this flick could probably have an entire hour cut from it. Most of that footage would be uninspired “travelogue” shots. I’m a pretty big fan of David Niven, and to me he is Phileas Fogg. Niven does his best to keep the momentum going in a cameo laden opus, but at 3 hours, that is difficult to do. Grade C+

The Good

Marty (1955)

    Yes, it’s just the small story but it is told in such a way that it seems bigger. Ernest Borgnine stars as the titular Bronx butcher in this romantic drama. The film is often forgotten in Oscar history, which is a bit of a shame. I think if you dug Silver Linings Playbook, you’ll probably like Marty. Grade: B+

Gigi (1958)

   A few weeks after I watched this, I went to see La La Land. Which I think enhanced both films. I was actually dreading watching this one, it struck me as one of those kind of musicals that would require insulin shots after watching. I liked it more than I expected. The story of the romance of Gigi and Gaston is told in lavish color and great cinematography. However, the song “Thank God for Little Girls” has not aged well at all. Grade: B

The Great

American in Paris (1951)

     Another film enhanced by seeing La La Land around the same time. I still think Singin’ in the Rain is better film, but American in Paris is a pretty solid movie musical. Gene Kelly in near top form with great songs. Seriously, the dancing is some of the best ever filmed. A good time indeed. Grade: A-

The Bridge Over River Kwai (1957)

    WWII again. I will say I wish there were more war films like this, there is an odd sense of “adventure” that other war films of the period are missing. There was a great sense of suspense even though you pretty much know how everything is gonna pan out. I feel like this film makes interesting remarks about the difference between the Brits, the Americans, and the Japanese at the time. It made me realize just how quintessentially American William Holden could be. Grade: A-
 

The Essential

All About Eve (1950)

First film to be nominated for 14 awards and probably one of the best films about rivalry and relationships. It deserves all its praise. This story of two actresses and how they affect each others lives sticks with you for a long time afterward. I do know some folks that don’t like this flick because of that reason. I don’t think they are wrong, the film certainly leaves an impression- all because of how well it was written, directed, acted, and produced. Grade: A

From Here to Eternity (1953)

    Like Mrs. Miniver, this is a “war” movie that isn’t really about the war. It's a story of soldiers stationed in Hawaii just before December 7th. This is another one of those often referenced films, with the beach makeout scene lampooned particularly well in Airplane! More a domestic military drama than a war film, every actor in this film gives it their all. All the principals were nominated and Frank Sinatra and Donna Reed won their categories. An interesting look at the beginning of a dark time. Grade: A

On the Waterfront (1954)

    Brando, man. This crime drama of dockworkers really is one of the greatest films of all time. Like most films of that caliber, it has been parodied to hell. How many folks know the “I could’ve been a contender” scene without really knowing this film? It’s a bit of a shame because the power of that scene has almost been diminished because of it.  Almost, thankfully. If you haven’t actually sat down to watch this, I recommend you do soon. It is director Elia Kazan’s masterpiece. Grade: A
 

Ben-Hur (1959)

    There are two epic films to end all epic films, in my opinion: this and Lawrence of Arabia. Though this film is approximately 4000 years long, I never grew bored or disengaged. This film is spectacle at its highest without being overindulgent somehow. I also like the somewhat disputed claims of homoerotic subtext between Massala and Ben-Hur. Partly because it pissed Charlton Heston to no end, but really because it gives an interesting wrinkle to the story. I’m fairly sure Massala's Stephen Boyd played it that way too. I don’t know why anyone thought it was worth it to remake this last year. Grade: A

Come back Thursday for the 60s!

Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 1940-1949

Let's continue the journey through the Best Picture winners into a really solid decade. To me, with the exception of maybe 1939, the 1940s were the apex of the Golden Age of Hollywood. Some true classics came out of this era and there are some years that all the nominees are worth watching.

1940-1949

“Really? This was ‘the Best?’”

How Green Was My Valley (1941)

Going My Way (1944)

    Okay, unlike the previous entries in this category, these aren’t bad movies really. They are being sorted here because there were way better films that should have won instead. Going My Way is a nice little musical about Bing Crosby as a priest in New York with fine tunes and good performances, but is it really better than Double Indemnity? Though, I do admit that Billy Wilder’s noir classic is in my top five favorite films of all time. How Green Was My Valley also isn’t a bad film by any stretch of the imagination, but it really isn’t better than Citizen Kane. I get why Kane didn’t win, in a political sense I suppose, but the also nominated Maltese Falcon is better than Valley too. Valley however, being the plight of Welch miners is about as “Academy Award” as it can get without being The English Patient.

Grades: B (for both)

The Good

The Lost Weekend (1945)

    This film’s win kind of gives credence to my whole Double Indemnity over Going My Way argument. It’s like the Academy was like, “Yeah, we did bad last year, sorry about that.” Weekend was also helmed by Wilder (who also won Best Director, having lost the previous year). This saga of an alcoholic trying and failing to stop became the blueprint for "problem" pictures. What seems cliche now, wasn't quite back in 1945. This film isn’t bad really, Milland’s performance is engaging if a little Cage-esque, but it sure comes off as annoyingly preachy toward the end. Grade: B 

Gentleman’s Agreement (1947)

    This is preachy too and much more hamfisted when viewed today. Even so, it is a pretty good film, and Gregory Peck just knocks it out of the park. It’s a good story of racial prejudice and anti-semitism, but you can’t help but feel that the kid gloves are on. Also there is something icky about Peck pretending to be Jewish for a newspaper column. But maybe that ickiness adds something. Grade: B+

Hamlet (1948)

   There's a chance I rated this higher because I’m a bit of a Shakespeare fan. I like alternative retellings more (Scotland, PA being my favorite), but this dreamy ethereal adaptation is quite interesting. I really dig the set design Olivier used. Something about the open space and the fogginess really works with Hamlet. Also everybody puts in amazing performances, albeit in typical "Shakespearean" ways. If you aren’t into Big Bill or the Prince of Denmark, this will be a chore. But if you have even the slightest interest, you’ll like it. Grade: B

The Great

Rebecca (1940)

    Hitchcock’s only Best Picture winner is from an extremely stellar year. Most of the best pic nominees that year are classics in their own right, but I can see why this won out. One of the best Gothic romances ever, and Hitch's second of three Daphne du Maurier adaptations. The story of an unnamed woman who marries a widower aristocrat, and how he and everyone in the house is haunted by his late wife. Like every Hitchcock film, I notice something new every time I watch it. It isn’t Hitch’s best work, but it is better than Foreign Correspondent, Hitch's other film nominated that year. A ghostly, great film. Grade: A-

Mrs. Miniver (1942)

    I confess that I am super burnt out on WWII films. I was burnt out before I started watching all these films, and after this exercise I’m probably gonna be burnt out for a few years at least. I think what made me like this was the fact that it focused solely “at home.”  A domestic drama foremost, but it’s definitely a war film. The British setting also makes the stakes higher, as an air raid could happen at any minute. My favorite aspect of the film, without giving too much away, is that it goes the other way with a certain expectation. Not so much a twist, but a better way to tell the story. You’ll have to see it to know what I mean. Grade: A

All the King’s Men (1949)

    I’m glad I watched this during an election year, but it is still pretty relevant in general. The rise and fall of a rural politician isn't anything new, even back then, but it's a story that needs retelling from time to time. Basically the thesis of the film could be boiled down (albeit cynically) to “This is how populism works.” If you haven’t seen it, watch this with the similarly themed Face in the Crowd. Grade: B+

The Essential

Casablanca (1943)

    You’re not surprised about this, are you? Okay, I must admit that until last year I hadn't sat down to watch the whole thing. I knew the story well, and had seen all of it in bits and pieces. You probably know the story about Rick, his bar, and his lost love that returns- all the while dealing with Nazis. Even with that knowledge and the fact that this is one of the most referenced films ever, I was transfixed. Though a WWII film, it never really feels like a war film like Miniver does. Possibly the most essential title you will encounter in all the winners, and it totally lives up to its hype. Grade: A+

The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)

     An ensemble drama of veterans returning home. Harold Russell gives one of the greatest performances in the history of acting as a double amputee. Overlong yes, melodramatic for sure, but still essential. It would become the template of all “back from the war” dramas. In a lot of ways The Deer Hunter is just the Vietnam version of this. Despite it’s flaws, the performances and the epic closeness of the story are just classic. Grade: A- 

See you guys next Tuesday for the 1950s!

Sorting Through the Best Pictures: 1927-1939

 Being a film buff and a bit of an Oscar nerd (they are my Super Bowl), I spent 2016 watching and reviewing all the best picture winners. One does not watch 87 movies without noticing some things. What is considered the "best" from year to year is an interesting concept. Some were obvious, others… not so much. With this year's nominees being announced today, I figured it be a good time to sort through the lot. Most internet folks are into ranking, and when I started the project I thought about doing that too, but I instead found myself placing them in categories of quality: “Essential,” “Great,” “Good” and “Really? This is the Best?” So that is what I’m going to do here. Decade by Decade. Every Tuesday and Thursday until the Oscar ceremonies.

1927-1939

“Really? This was ‘the Best?’”

My “Really? This was the Best?” category has more entries in this era than in other decades. Some of that is due to the Academy's infancy, but really the early days of the Oscars were not that different from today. Some movies won out for what I can only assume are “just because” reasons, instead of actual merits of quality. That still happens, but this first period has a lot of egregious examples. Flicks in this category are generally not so great. However, in some cases, these won out over much more deserving films.

The Broadway Melody (1928/29)

  The second ever Best Picture winner and I can really only justify its winning with “best utilization of the medium of sound.” I guess it has interesting musical numbers, but it was quite hard to find it at all interesting in a 2010s mindset. Honestly, it’s a bit of snoozefest and the love story seems trite even for the 20s. A definite contender for the worst of “the best.” Grade: D+

Cimarron (1930/31)

This failed epic must have won due to its grand scope concerning westward expansion and such. It’s based off an Edna Farber book, which explains its aspirations, but this certainly has failed the test of time. It comes off as racist and kind of boring, especially when compared to later westerns. After watching, I felt that this was just a film that tried to be something bigger and did not. The Front Page (also nominated that year), is a better, if smaller film. Grade: D

Cavalcade (1932/33)

    Once again, I think this won for being the “biggest” movie of that year. Based on the Noel Coward play, which I read before viewing, the film is about the history of two families, the Bridges and the Marryots. We see major historical events (like the sinking of the Titanic) through their eyes. It's an interesting idea and is a fine adaptation of its source, but like its source, is extremely stagey and dull. I can’t help but feel that year's I Am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang or 42nd Street were better films. Grade C-

The Great Ziegfeld (1936)

    Another “big” movie that wasn’t the best. A bloated three-hour epic about the life of showbiz king Flo Ziegfeld. It’s a musical drama, showcasing a fair amount of talent of all involved. It was enjoyable to actually see Fanny Brice in something. William Powell does an admirable job, but I never felt like I was watching anything particularly special. It drags on and on, and perhaps were it only a two-hour affair it would be a more worthy film. But what really puts this in the “Really?” category is that this won over Capra’s Mr. Deeds Goes to Town which excels above this in various ways. Grade: C

The Good

These two aren’t what I’d call “bad” films, but they just aren’t as “great” as they should be to be considered the “best.”

Mutiny on the Bounty (1935)

    The first “big deal” adaptation of the novel is a pretty decent film. Clark Gable puts in some of his best work and Charles Laughton delivers an iconic, if often parodied, performance. I don’t really have any major qualms with the film, just that when I finished watching it, I felt underwhelmed. Perhaps 1935 wasn’t a super amazing year. When looking at the nominees for that year, I think The Informer is a better film, but I can understand why this won instead. Grade: B-

The Life of Emile Zola (1937)

    Once again, this isn’t a bad flick. It’s actually pretty good and Paul Muni puts in a great performance. I was more interested than I expected. Strangely though, being about the life of Zola seems to hurt its focus. It could be a little tighter, focusing more on his trial and its origins, but it makes sense why the film shows so much. It seems to learn from the mistakes of Ziegfeld in that regard. Maybe A Star is Born or The Awful Truth were better films from 1937, but Zola is a well made biopic, and the Academy (even in its early days) loved it some biopics. Grade: B

The Great

These are films that are truly worth your time, but it isn’t the end of the world if you haven’t seen them.

All Quiet on the Western Front (1929/30)

    Possibly the sound era's first great war film and Universal’s first best picture. Most of us probably had to read the Remarque book at some point in our education and maybe you watched this, but you probably got the later remake with John Boy. This is the better film, though that might be a closer adaptation. Not the first “war is hell” movie, but this one really resonated with audiences. The butterfly on the helmet would become an iconic shot for years to come. Not the best war film, but pretty important, if not quite essential. Grade: B+

You Can’t Take it with You (1938)

    A truly delightful film based on the stage play. Frank Capra was at the top of his game here and it is one of the rare comedies to win best picture. It’s a good time. A perfect Sunday afternoon type flick. I like this film, but I feel that Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (even if it wasn’t Best Picture) is more essential Capra. Grade: A-

The Essential

These are films that stood the test of time in their importance and quality. None of these are gonna surprise you and if you are a film buff, these are (like the category says) essential viewing. Though, to be honest, a film doesn’t have to be great to be essential. More on that in a bit.

Wings (1927/28)

    A silent classic, yes, but is it one of the best silent films? Maybe not. The photography is amazing, the story and the drama are enthralling. It’s worth your time. I’m not sure it stands up to other silent classics of the era, such as Vidor’s The Crowd or Murnau’s Sunrise. Wings has more spectacle than those films, but it doesn’t quite have the artistry of other important silent films. Its position of being the first to win makes it essential, but it is also essential in it would set precedents on the kind of films the Oscars would favor. It is a great early example of the genre of ‘Academy Award.” Grade" B+

Grand Hotel (1931/32)

    I’ll admit, I’m a big fan of ensemble pics. I know they aren’t everyone’s cup of tea, but this is one of the first “seemingly disconnected people in one location” film so it’s worth checking out. That alone makes it essential (at least to me), but the performances and the story are quite exemplary as well- even if it drags a bit. "I vant to be alone" would go down as one of the most quotable lines in film history. I like to think that Robert Altman spent most of his career perfecting Grand Hotel. Grade: B+

It Happened One Night  (1934)

    This is the film all Romantic Comedies aspire to be. If you haven’t seen it, you should remedy that. This won picture, writing, directing, actor, and actress. That didn't happen again until 1975. That's a pretty big deal. It's hilarious and moving, all the great stuff of Frank Capra without all the saccharine. Grade: A

Gone with the Wind (1939)

    Alright, there really isn’t anything I can say about this flick that hasn’t already been said. Is it a bit long? Yeah. Kinda racist? Oh yeah. Is it really that big a deal? I’d say probably so. It’s not a movie that you need to see more than once necessarily, but it’s worth your time if only because so much is derived from it. Also, it actually is a great movie. I don’t know if it is one of the best I’ve ever seen, but to me it is the apex of how great and huge a film can be. Grade: A-

Honorable mention/random note: There were technically two “best picture” winners at the first Oscars. These were “Outstanding” and “Unique and Artistic Picture.” Notice that neither of these are really the definition of the word “best.” “Outstanding” does not necessarily mean superlative, and “Unique and Artistic” means, well, just that. So the first “Best” picture winners were Wings and Sunrise (which is essential viewing by the way, an A+). “Unique and Artistic” only lasted the one year so “Outstanding” would become the “Best Picture” award. Sometimes, I wonder if the Academy would have been stirred a different way if Sunrise was retroactively considered the first winner instead of Wings. Not much of a “what if,” but I get the feeling that films like Citizen Kane and Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? may have taken the top prize in their respective years.

Come back Thursday for the 40s!!